Tonight’s Conspiracy Theory to expose toxins in water, population control motives and water privatization schemes worldwide; Premieres FRIDAY, DEC. 3 AT 10 PM EST/ 9 PM CST

Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
December 3, 2010

As producer Michael Braverman announced yesterday, what was once an episode just dealing with schemes to profit off the Great Lakes has now expanded into a startling exposé of the dangerous toxins being added to our water by design. Now known as the “Worldwide Water Conspiracy,” tonight’s episode of Conspiracy Theory with Gov. Jesse Ventura will take on water privatization, false scarcity profit schemes, the effects of fluoride, lithium and uranium in drinking water and much more. “WORLDWIDE WATER CONSPIRACY” PREMIERES TONIGHT, FRIDAY DEC. 3 AT 10 PM EST / 9 PM CST.

Scarcity, perceived or real, drives the value of commodities, and many people say water is the next oil. The Great Lakes consist of more than 20% of Earth’s surface fresh water, but the levels are dropping. Some streams and groundwater sources have already dried up, and a shortage of clean drinking water could prove to be one of the 21st Century’s greatest bubbles.

Now, Gov. Ventura’s investigation reveals that foreign companies are stealing water from the Great Lakes, imposing upon one of the American public’s greatest assets. Already, the scale of schemes to privatize water and make big profit on a clear necessity are astounding. The TruTV team has learned that the Nestle Corporation is one of the firms tapping this water to sell in bottled water and other products. Moreover, it has circumvented public access points to the lakes by stashing its pumps 12 miles away from the shore of Lake Michigan– in a private game preserve where no one can see them and little scrutiny is likely to arise.

Moreover, Ventura has uncovered a novel way of siphoning this “blue gold.” Giant floating water bags have been implemented to create huge “water trains” and profiteers are using them to ship America’s fresh water to foreign countries like China. If the multinational corporations are not stopped, they’ll take our “champagne water” and leave us to drink the toilet water. Think it can’t happen here? In countries like Bolivia, where private companies have taken control of the water, ordinary people have already had to protest against the police state in order to simply collect rainwater for basic needs. Now, the right to collect rainwater has been challenged here in the United States as well.

But the Conspiracy Theory episode stumbles upon an even greater danger lurking in the water. Testing shows that numerous deadly toxins have been found in the majority of America’s tap water, and it’s no accident. Could population control through forced mass medication in water be underway? This form of control was discussed in sitting-White House Science Czar John P. Holdren’s book Ecoscience as far back as 1977.

The team learns that male birth rates are dropping all over the world. To find out why, Ventura & co. speak with radiation exposure expert Leuren Moret who drops the bombshell that uranium– yes uranium– is found in our drinking water and is triggering a mass-feminization in the population via a hormonal-chemical assault. The New York Times reported in 2009 that some 49 million Americans are drinking water contaminated with chemicals like arsenic or radioactive substances like uranium. Further, in 2010, the State of Texas was caught covering up dangerous and illegal levels of uranium in its water supplies that can cause cell mutations and cancer. Other chemicals including fluoride further raise suspicions about who is controlling what goes into our bodies, and why.

There is every reason to believe that Big Brother wants ordinary Americans calm and docile, unable to resist their system. Is that why government experts and leading bio-ethicists are advocating adding dose amounts of lithium to municipal water districts? Lithium is commonly to used to sedate patients suffering from bi-polar disorder, and the agenda has been put forward ostensibly to reduce suicides in the population. However, issuing a mass dose to the population is not only dangerous, as the amount affects people differently, but a form of true medical tyranny.

Full Story

Large Hadron Collider is full of new surprises, not always pleasant ones. It was recently discovered that even the famous Nostradamus predicted the emergence in Europe of a "satanic arc of fury" threatening dire consequences across the globe. What is not quite clear is whether the prophecy has anything to do with the collider.
Michel Nostradamus, who lived in the 16th century, was not just a physician and astrologer, but also a person with extensive scientific knowledge. Until now, we do not know for certain what the sources of his information about the future were. He was said to have built a "mirror" machine in which he saw pictures of the future. Perhaps, it was a medieval time machine.

The modern interpreters of his works believe that the prophecies of Nostradamus for 2010 should be sought in quatrains X of X Centuries. There is also a mentioning of some "satanic arc if fury in Europe," which in November of 2010 may cause "terrible burning "of half of the globe. As a result, in 2011, deadly precipitation will occur and everything will be infected by it. There will be no plants, no animals, and by 2016 all people will perish.

Until recently it was believed that he could have been talking about a launch of a ballistic missile (Nostradamus, who was not familiar with the realities of the 21st century, could see a rocket trajectory as a "satanic arc"). In this case, radioactive precipitation makes sense. However, a significant event occurred on November 4th and 7th of this year: the collider testers recorded the first collisions of lead ions at a very high speed.

"The purpose of the experiments is to obtain a quark-gluon plasma," said Yuri Kharlov with the Institute of High Energy Physics, who now works at CERN. "A full disintegration of the matter into quarks, gluons, and bosons - this has never been observed before."

What can this kind of testing result in? After all, if the universe was formed as a result of the Big Bang, there may be a reverse process. If researchers can "accelerate" the particles, raising the energy level and temperature, and increasing the intensity of their collision, etc., then it is possible that Earth will turn into a giant proton-e-bomb whose explosion will shake the entire solar system.

Yet, even if an explosion of this intensity will not happen, then the processes started by the acceleration of particles will cause terrible environmental consequences for the planet. However, a softer version is possible as well, which was predicted by Nostradamus: the catastrophe will affect only half of the globe. Perhaps the ocean will be able to protect America and Australia, since water absorbs heat. Yet it all depends on the intensity of the destructive processes.

A former Soviet psychic Wolf Messing used to mention "a dangerous lab in the mountains of Europe." Unfortunately, the meaning of these prophecies remained unclear until recently. Meanwhile, some researchers are seriously talking about the fact that various natural disasters and abnormal weather patterns that became frequent lately may be "side effects" of the collider.

However, most scientists do not respond to all these fears, rightly believing that those who expressed them were simply bad students in school and did not learn their physics well. From their point of view, there is no potential danger, because to create a "black hole" you must have the strongest gravitational compression created by a huge mass of matter. The collider is simply incapable of this.

In general, experiments with the LHC are not something new to mankind. Particle accelerators have been extensively used in research laboratories since the mid twentieth century, and no one has yet seen any harm caused by them. Additionally, accidents and malfunctions in such devices are extremely rare, and nuclear power plants explode even more frequently.

Yet, none of the predecessors of the current Large Hadron Collider failed to achieve similar rates of particle acceleration. Nevertheless, these rates still cannot match the speed of light. But, as we recall, according to Einstein's formula (E = mc2), for the mass to turn into energy, meaning, for our planet to explode, its value must be doubled. At lower speeds nothing like this can happen.

The assumptions made about the fact that the collider could affect the planet's climate are generally ungrounded. What could this device do? Emit large amounts of heat into the atmosphere? But even if that happens (after all, the collider has a very reliable protection), this amount of heat energy is unlikely to be greater than that released during the eruption. As we know, they affect the climate only locally, i.e. only in those areas where they are located.

Nor should we fear that red-hot plasma will leak onto the territory of Europe. Even if that happens, its amount is so small that it is not enough even to burn the forest around the giant accelerator.

As for the prophecies of Nostradamus, as we know, all connections to specific dates are very, very doubtful. The dating of events in his prophecies is traced according to a slightly modified Hebrew calendar, which dates from the creation of the world (in this case Nostradamus, for some reason, pushed the date back another 1,000 years). There is no system in place that could accurately compare the dates of these two very different systems of chronology.

It very well may be that all the horrors predicted by Nostradamus have nothing to do with our time.
Most likely, the collider should not be afraid of. Yet, anything can happen and it may be a good decision to stop the experiment before it is too late.

Irina Shlionskaya
Anton Evseev
Pravda.RU

The two ought to know: Coleen Rowley, the Minneapolis FBI agent who tried to sound the alarm a month before 9/11, and Bogdan Dzakovic, a special agent for the FAA’s security division, who was a leader of the agency’s “Red Team” that was warning officials about vulnerabilities in airport security just before 9/11.

“Things might have been different if there had been a quick, confidential way to get information out,” the two write—and WikiLeaks could have provided exactly that, according to their op-ed in the LA Times on Friday.

The information they wanted to get out was about Zacarias Moussaoui, the French Moroccan attending flight school in Minnesota who was interested in learning how to fly a commercial jet, but was not interested in learning how to land one. Rowley was one of those trying to sound the alarm about him. And a foreign intelligence service had reported that Moussaoui had connections with a foreign terrorist group.

Less than a month before 9/11, an FBI supervisor sent a warning to officials in Washington.  He pleaded that he was “trying to keep someone from taking a plane and crashing into the World Trade Center.” 

It doesn’t get much more specific than that. But FBI officials in Washington refused to act, or make any public statement about Moussaoui.

“WikiLeaks might have provided a pressure valve for those agents who were terribly worried about what might happen and frustrated by their superiors’ seeming indifference,” Rowley and Dzakovic argue. “Their bosses issued continual warnings against ‘talking to the media’ and frowned on whistle-blowing, yet the agents felt a strong need to protect the public.”

The 9/11 Commission concluded that the 9/11 hijackers probably would have postponed their action if information about Moussaoui’s secret arrest had become public. And if WikiLeaks had existed, it could have made the information public.

“Official channels for whistle-blower protections have long proved illusory,” Rowley and Dzakovic write. Worried and frustrated FBI agents could go to the media, “but that can’t be done fully anonymously, and it also puts reporters at risk of being sent to jail for refusing to reveal their sources.” 

Therefore, they conclude, “WikiLeaks provides a crucial safety valve”—one that could have prevented 9/11.

Jon Wiener

Source: http://www.thenation.com/blog/155425/could-wikileaks-have-prevented-911-former-fbi-agent-says-yes